The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's Joint Findings, Award, & Order except it amended the permanent disability rating for the applicant's February 9, 2012 left thigh injury to 6% permanent disability, warranting 18 weeks of permanent disability indemnity.
Permanent total disability award start date changed to April 25, 2015; retroactive temporary disability and attorney fees awarded; future medical care awarded
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Order, allowing applicant to treat with Dr. Curtis Spencer as her primary treating physician (PTP) outside of defendant's MPN, subject to defendant's future compliance with transfer of care provisions.
April 14, 2020 Findings and Order affirmed except Finding of Fact No. 7 and Order amended to find amended application not barred by statute of limitations
The June 27, 2019 Findings and Order is rescinded and substituted with new Findings of Fact determining California has jurisdiction over the claimed injury.
Petition for Reconsideration granted in part; the January 21, 2021 Finding of Fact is amended to find that applicant is an employee of the County of Riverside.
The WCAB affirmed the Findings Award and Supplemental Finding and Addition to Award except for clerical corrections to credit dates of service since June 2, 2018, deferred ruling on sanctions and attorney fees for lien claimant under sections 5813 and Rule 10786, found lien claimant entitled to penalties and interest under section 4603.2(b)(2), and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
Petition for reconsideration dismissed; petition for removal granted; WCJ's January 19, 2022 orders rescinded; matter returned for further proceedings.
Petitions for Reconsideration are dismissed: the March 28, 2022 petition failed to allege aggrievement and the June 23, 2022 petition is moot, illegible, and skeletal.
The Appeals Board rescinded the Joint Finding and Order of November 13, 2020, and substituted an order that applicant's life pension shall be accelerated by the commutation of permanent disability and lump sum payment of permanent disability.
Petition for reconsideration granted solely to amend the occupational group number to 360 in Finding of Fact No. 1; otherwise, the May 24, 2022 Joint Findings of Fact and Order is affirmed.
The Findings and Order allegedly issued by a workers' compensation arbitrator on August 6, 2021 is rescinded and the matter is returned to the arbitrator for a new decision consistent with this opinion.
The WCAB granted the Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the April 25, 2022 Findings, Award & Order, amended the permanent and stationary date to November 3, 2016, found injury to the psyche, ordered further development of the record for internal medicine and urology issues, and deferred permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees pending further development.
The WCAB rescinded the February 7, 2022 Findings and Award and substituted new findings denying the September 13, 2021 Request for Authorization and finding no requirement for utilization review; applicant is not entitled to the Functional Restoration Program at defendant's expense.