What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied, lien claimant failed to meet burden of proof to establish legal entitlement to payment for services rendered.
Lien claimant Prime Physical Therapy sought reconsideration of the Findings and Order issued by the WCJ denying their lien claim for payment under Labor Code section 4903(b). The WCJ had found the lien claimant failed to prove entitlement to payment.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Lien claimant failed to produce evidence that it was the owner of the lien under Labor Code section 4903.8(a)(2) and thus failed to meet its burden of proof for entitlement to payment.
From the decision · page 4evidence that it was "the owner of the lien" under section 4903.8, subdivision (a)(2).
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Lien claimant did not produce evidence that it was the owner of the lien under Labor Code section 4903.8(a)(2).