The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB granted the Petition for Removal, rescinded the WCJ Order issued on June 2, 2016, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
February 27, 2014 en banc decision rescinded; Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant denied; September 20, 2013 Findings and Order of WCJ affirmed
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's February 18, 2014 dismissal of the IMR appeal for lack of verification and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ.
The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration and ordered further proceedings and decision on whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required, pending issuance of a Decision After Reconsideration.
The WCAB en banc rescinded the WCJ's September 23, 2013 decision and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings to determine whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required.
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's Findings, Award and Order Re: Lien of E&M Interpreting for services on June 20, 2006, and February 9, 2007, but deferred decision on the remainder of the lien for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Affirmed February 3, 2009 en banc decision with clarifications and modifications; remanded both cases to WCJ for further proceedings on permanent disability issues.
The permanent disability-related findings are rescinded and the matters are remanded to the respective assigned WCJs for further proceedings and new decisions consistent with this opinion. The issues of permanent disability, defendant's credit against liability, reasonable attorney's fees, temporary disability indemnity, medical treatment, and medical-legal liens are deferred with jurisdiction reserved.
Applicant's permanent disability rated at 6% after 50% apportionment to preexisting condition under the new PDRS effective January 1, 2005; costs for vocational expert Ann Wallace's testimony allowed with jurisdiction reserved for adjustment; liens disallowed for non-industrial neck disability.
The Appeals Board rescinded the May 6, 2004 WCJ decision and remanded the matter to the WCJ to allow the defendant a reasonable time to initiate the AME/QME procedure and for the WCJ to redetermine the applicant's entitlement to right shoulder surgery after completion of the AME/QME procedure.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's determination awarding the testosterone cream treatment as reasonably required to relieve the applicant from the effects of his industrial injury.
The Board rescinded the WCJ's decisions and held that Labor Code section 4650(d) applies only to periodic indemnity payments and not to lump sum commutations or compromise and release proceeds, thus no penalty under section 4650(d) or 5814 applies to such lump sum payments.