SIMILARCASE

Loading

Sign in Sign up Try a case →

California WCABPanel decision

ADJ11413863 · February 8, 2021

Petition for Reconsideration denied, affirming the finding of industrial injury.

Issues decided: 1
Medical opinions weighed: 1
Authorities named: 1
District office: Oxnard

What the panel ordered

Petition for Reconsideration denied, affirming the finding of industrial injury.

Defendant sought reconsideration of the November 18, 2020 Findings and Order that found applicant sustained an industrial injury to his respiratory system and valley fever during employment.

Read the official decision →

What was disputed, and how it came out

Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.

AOE/COEApplicant prevailedrespiratory system

The PQME Dr. Hendel provided a reasoned medical opinion based on reasonable medical probability that the applicant contracted valley fever at work, supported by the applicant's outdoor work exposure and antibody evidence, which the WCJ and panel found substantial.

From the decision · page 1Defendant seeks reconsideration of the November 18, 2020 Findings and Order wherein the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) found that applicant, while employed by the State of California as a vocational instructor during the period January 14, 2014 through June 1, 2018, sustained injury arising out of and in the course of his employment to his respiratory system and in the form of valley fever.

The facts that decided it

Private workspace

Your case already resembles someone else’s. Find whose.

Paste the dispute. The extractor builds the factors, the search finds the decisions the same facts won, and the matter stays saved. Free account.

Start a matter Search without an account →

ADJ11413863 — California WCAB decision · SimilarCase

Applicant had elevated IgM antibody for coccidioidomycosis in September 2017 indicating acute infection in July or August 2017.

Favours Applicant prevailed

This timing of infection supported the finding that the injury arose during employment.

From the decision · page 2As mentioned above, Eli Hendel, M.D., acted as PQME in this case. At his deposition, Dr. Hendel testified that applicant "was found to have the elevated antibody of coccidioidomycosis in September of 2017. The antibody that he was discovered was the IgM type, which is the acute antibody. (Exh. C, November 13, 2019, Deposition of Eli Hendel, M.D., p. 14:21-25.) Dr. Hendel was able to determine that applicant was infected in July or August of 2017. (Id. at 15:3-4.) Dr. Hendel explained "But to the level of reasonable medical probability, the preponderance of the time that he's been outdoors during that period was during work. (Id. at 31:22-24.) When questioned about whether soil samples would be helpful in assessing where applicant was exposed to the valley fever spores (coccidioidomycosis), Dr. Hendel testified as follows:

Applicant spent the preponderance of his outdoor time during the infection period at work rather than at home.

Favours Applicant prevailed

This supported the medical opinion that the infection was contracted at work.

From the decision · page 2As mentioned above, Eli Hendel, M.D., acted as PQME in this case. At his deposition, Dr. Hendel testified that applicant "was found to have the elevated antibody of coccidioidomycosis in September of 2017. The antibody that he was discovered was the IgM type, which is the acute antibody. (Exh. C, November 13, 2019, Deposition of Eli Hendel, M.D., p. 14:21-25.) Dr. Hendel was able to determine that applicant was infected in July or August of 2017. (Id. at 15:3-4.) Dr. Hendel explained "But to the level of reasonable medical probability, the preponderance of the time that he's been outdoors during that period was during work. (Id. at 31:22-24.) When questioned about whether soil samples would be helpful in assessing where applicant was exposed to the valley fever spores (coccidioidomycosis), Dr. Hendel testified as follows: