California WCABLaw firm

Greenup, Hartson & Rosenfeld

Greenup, Hartson & Rosenfeld is named in 6 released California WCAB decisions from 2021–2024. The disputes run to AOE/COE (2), Psyche AOE/COE (1) and Jurisdiction / venue (1). They were heard most often at Van Nuys, then Oxnard. The firm it meets most often is Michael Burgis & Associates (1).

Decisions: 6
Years: 2021–2024
Issues disputed: 4
District offices: 2

Defense sideRead off how the firm is printed in the service list of its own decisions — 5 of 5 agree. It is our reading of the record, not the firm’s description of itself.

What they litigate

Disputed issues across the decisions this firm is named in. Every row opens the decisions it counts.

Who they face

3 more firms appear in the same decisions and are not listed: we could not read which side they were on.

Carriers and administrators

Where they appear

Van Nuys 5
Oxnard 1

How the appealed decisions came out

These are decisions that were appealed and published — the tail of a system that mostly settles. Most claims end in a compromise and release or a stipulation and never reach a panel, so nothing below describes how this firm does its work. It describes how a set of appealed disputes came out.

4 for the applicant
1 for the defense
1 returned for more record

Counted over 6 appealed decisions. Not this firm’s book of work.

Decisions

Newest decisions this firm is named in, each with the passage the panel turned on and a link to the official PDF.

ADJ14904660 · 2024-02-05 · Van Nuys District OfficeAOE/COEapplicant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.4the services of a Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator (PQME), Dr. Moheimani. PQME. Dr.
The WCJ found the applicant's testimony credible and supported by substantial evidence including the PQME report of Dr. Moheimani, who found the injuries industrially caused and medically probable, establishing AOE/COE for the cumulative trauma injury claim.
Official decision · page 4 →
ADJ15734362 · 2023-10-09 · Van Nuys District OfficePsyche AOE/COEapplicant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.5Based on the unrebutted medical expert opinions of Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator (PQME) Linslee Egan, M.D. in psychiatry and of PQME Kouron Daldalyan in internal medicine, which are further supported by the expert opinions of Primary Treating Physician (PTP) Marcia Lamm, Ph.D. and Vera David, Ph.D. in psychology, it was found that applicant sustained injury arising out of and in the course of employment to her psyche, gastrointestinal system, and in the form of headaches and bruxism. Dr. Egan diagnosed PTSD, with a GAF of 55, not yet at maximal medical improvement (MMI), causing temporary disability from January 7, 2022 and ongoing. Dr. Egan's causation
The panel found that the applicant sustained injury to psyche, gastrointestinal system, headaches and bruxism arising out of and in the course of employment based on unrebutted medical expert opinions of PQME Dr. Egan and Dr. Daldalyan, supported by PTP Dr. Lamm and Dr. David, with causation apportioned primarily to workplace trauma and workload, and less than 25% to personnel actions, thus compensable under Labor Code Section 3208.3(h).
Official decision · page 5 →
ADJ11726227 · 2023-09-22 · Van Nuys District OfficeMedical treatment / UR / IMRapplicant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.25For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration of the Findings of Fact and Order issued on June 27, 2023 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as the Decision After Reconsideration, that the Findings of Fact and Order issued on June 27, 2023 is RESCINDED and the following is SUBSTITUTED therefor:
Defendant failed to meet its burden to show a change in applicant's condition or circumstances to justify discontinuing previously authorized home health care services, supported by substantial medical evidence from Drs. Huang and Franc.
Official decision · page 25 →
ADJ11994903 · 2021-11-05 · Oxnard District OfficeJurisdiction / venuedefendant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.2Here, the petition for disqualification does not set forth facts, declared under penalty of perjury, that are sufficient to establish disqualification pursuant to Labor Code section 5311, WCAB Rule 10960, and Code of Civil Procedure section 641(f) and/or (g). Accordingly, the request for disqualification will be denied.
The petitions for change of venue and disqualification were denied because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient factual basis for disqualification and failed to show grounds for change of venue, including unsupported claims of racism and bias.
Official decision · page 2 →
ADJ8969732 · 2021-07-02 · Van Nuys District OfficeAOE/COEapplicant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.31) the applicant, while employed on 03/03/2013 as a meat receiver, occupational group 460, at Valley Glen, California by Vallarta Supermarkets sustained injury to his low back, and claims to have sustained gastro-intestinal injury as a compensable consequence thereof, as a new and further disability. At the time of the 03/03/2013 date of injury, the carrier was Safety National Casualty Corporation, administered by Sedgwick CMS.
The evidence, including consistent testimony and reports from the primary treating physician and orthopedic AME, supports that the gastrointestinal injury is a compensable consequence of the low back injury, despite the rejection of Dr. Rahban's reports as not substantial medical evidence.
Official decision · page 3 →
ADJ9807196 · 2023-12-26 · Van Nuys District OfficeReconsideration / removalremanded
Determinative passage · p.1Defendant, Ace American Insurance Company (AAIC), petitions for reconsideration of the Amended Findings and Award issued by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in this matter on April 26, 2022. In that decision, the WCJ found that applicant sustained injury arising out of and in the course of employment on September 17, 2014, to his cervical spine, lumbar spine, upper and lower gastrointestinal system, headaches and diabetes arising out of and in the course of his employment by defendant, Trader Joe's Company. The WCJ also found that applicant is entitled to home care in an extent to be determined.
The Board granted reconsideration to study the issues and remanded the matter to the WCJ to consider the Compromise and Release, allowing further proceedings if needed.
Official decision · page 1 →

Also recorded as

The same firm is printed several ways across the decisions, and all of them were counted as one. This is every spelling behind the figures above.

Greenup, Hartson & Rosenfeld
GREENUP, HARTSON & ROSENFELD, LLP
GREENUP, HARTSON & ROSENFELD
GREENUP HARTSON & ROSENFELD
Greenup Hartson

Is this your firm and something here is wrong? Tell us and we will fix it. Every figure on this page is a count of released decisions this firm is named in, and the decisions themselves are listed above with the passage each turned on.

Also on this

Private workspace

Your case already resembles someone else’s. Find whose.

Paste the dispute. The extractor builds the factors, the search finds the decisions the same facts won, and the matter stays saved. Free account.

Start a matter Search without an account →

Greenup, Hartson & Rosenfeld

Decisions

Years

2021–2024

Issues disputed

District offices

How the appealed decisions came out

4 for the applicant

1 for the defense

1 returned for more record

Counted over 6 appealed decisions. Not this firm’s book of work.

Decisions

Newest decisions this firm is named in, each with the passage the panel turned on and a link to the official PDF.

ADJ14904660 · 2024-02-05 · Van Nuys District OfficeAOE/COEapplicant prevailed

Determinative passage · p.4the services of a Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator (PQME), Dr. Moheimani. PQME. Dr.

The WCJ found the applicant's testimony credible and supported by substantial evidence including the PQME report of Dr. Moheimani, who found the injuries industrially caused and medically probable, establishing AOE/COE for the cumulative trauma injury claim.

Official decision · page 4 →

ADJ15734362 · 2023-10-09 · Van Nuys District OfficePsyche AOE/COEapplicant prevailed

Determinative passage · p.5Based on the unrebutted medical expert opinions of Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator (PQME) Linslee Egan, M.D. in psychiatry and of PQME Kouron Daldalyan in internal medicine, which are further supported by the expert opinions of Primary Treating Physician (PTP) Marcia Lamm, Ph.D. and Vera David, Ph.D. in psychology, it was found that applicant sustained injury arising out of and in the course of employment to her psyche, gastrointestinal system, and in the form of headaches and bruxism. Dr. Egan diagnosed PTSD, with a GAF of 55, not yet at maximal medical improvement (MMI), causing temporary disability from January 7, 2022 and ongoing. Dr. Egan's causation

The panel found that the applicant sustained injury to psyche, gastrointestinal system, headaches and bruxism arising out of and in the course of employment based on unrebutted medical expert opinions of PQME Dr. Egan and Dr. Daldalyan, supported by PTP Dr. Lamm and Dr. David, with causation apportioned primarily to workplace trauma and workload, and less than 25% to personnel actions, thus compensable under Labor Code Section 3208.3(h).

Official decision · page 5 →

ADJ11726227 · 2023-09-22 · Van Nuys District OfficeMedical treatment / UR / IMRapplicant prevailed

Determinative passage · p.25For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration of the Findings of Fact and Order issued on June 27, 2023 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as the Decision After Reconsideration, that the Findings of Fact and Order issued on June 27, 2023 is RESCINDED and the following is SUBSTITUTED therefor:

Defendant failed to meet its burden to show a change in applicant's condition or circumstances to justify discontinuing previously authorized home health care services, supported by substantial medical evidence from Drs. Huang and Franc.

Official decision · page 25 →

ADJ11994903 · 2021-11-05 · Oxnard District OfficeJurisdiction / venuedefendant prevailed

Determinative passage · p.2Here, the petition for disqualification does not set forth facts, declared under penalty of perjury, that are sufficient to establish disqualification pursuant to Labor Code section 5311, WCAB Rule 10960, and Code of Civil Procedure section 641(f) and/or (g). Accordingly, the request for disqualification will be denied.

The petitions for change of venue and disqualification were denied because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient factual basis for disqualification and failed to show grounds for change of venue, including unsupported claims of racism and bias.

Official decision · page 2 →

ADJ8969732 · 2021-07-02 · Van Nuys District OfficeAOE/COEapplicant prevailed

Determinative passage · p.31) the applicant, while employed on 03/03/2013 as a meat receiver, occupational group 460, at Valley Glen, California by Vallarta Supermarkets sustained injury to his low back, and claims to have sustained gastro-intestinal injury as a compensable consequence thereof, as a new and further disability. At the time of the 03/03/2013 date of injury, the carrier was Safety National Casualty Corporation, administered by Sedgwick CMS.

The evidence, including consistent testimony and reports from the primary treating physician and orthopedic AME, supports that the gastrointestinal injury is a compensable consequence of the low back injury, despite the rejection of Dr. Rahban's reports as not substantial medical evidence.

Official decision · page 3 →

ADJ9807196 · 2023-12-26 · Van Nuys District OfficeReconsideration / removalremanded

Determinative passage · p.1Defendant, Ace American Insurance Company (AAIC), petitions for reconsideration of the Amended Findings and Award issued by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) in this matter on April 26, 2022. In that decision, the WCJ found that applicant sustained injury arising out of and in the course of employment on September 17, 2014, to his cervical spine, lumbar spine, upper and lower gastrointestinal system, headaches and diabetes arising out of and in the course of his employment by defendant, Trader Joe's Company. The WCJ also found that applicant is entitled to home care in an extent to be determined.

The Board granted reconsideration to study the issues and remanded the matter to the WCJ to consider the Compromise and Release, allowing further proceedings if needed.

Official decision · page 1 →