The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
March 4, 2021 F&O affirmed except lien of Mario Corzo Interpreting deferred and matter returned to trial level for further proceedings.
About this list
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the March 21, 2025 Findings and Order, found the December 11, 2024 Utilization Review determination untimely, vested the WCAB with jurisdiction over the medical treatment dispute, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; Findings of Fact and Order of June 21, 2024 affirmed except amended to find the microdiscectomy surgical procedure reasonable and necessary; request for surgery granted.
Petition for Reconsideration denied by the Appeals Board panel on November 27, 2023, affirming the WCJ's finding that Applicant failed to prove medical necessity of the disputed treatment in the October 28, 2021 RFA.
The Appeals Board rescinded the May 6, 2004 WCJ decision and remanded the matter to the WCJ to allow the defendant a reasonable time to initiate the AME/QME procedure and for the WCJ to redetermine the applicant's entitlement to right shoulder surgery after completion of the AME/QME procedure.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's determination awarding the testosterone cream treatment as reasonably required to relieve the applicant from the effects of his industrial injury.