The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
11
Page
1 of 1
Released decisions11 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ11055389 →Apr 7, 2025 · San BernardinoPanel decision
Petition for reconsideration granted; WCJ decision amended to defer permanent disability and apportionment issues with jurisdiction reserved; further medical treatment awarded.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB affirms its August 15, 2022 Opinion and Decision After Reconsideration, denying Waldschmidt's petition for reconsideration regarding the official address of record and due process claims.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; Findings and Award affirmed as amended to find 71% permanent disability; issues of Labor Code section 4658(d)(2) increase and attorney fees deferred; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; Findings of Fact of December 3, 2020 affirmed except that the issue of industrial injury in the form of prostate cancer is deferred for further development; heart presumption does not extend to kidney injury.