The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
33
Page
1 of 1
Released decisions33 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ16635028 →Jun 26, 2026 · Long BeachPanel decision
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's October 4, 2024 decision, and substituted new findings that the application ADJ18451814 was not duplicative of ADJ12117806, the presumption of compensability under Labor Code section 5402(b) does not apply, Dr. Jeffrey Nerenberg was validly obtained as QME, and discovery has not closed in ADJ18451814.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; original Findings and Order of July 26, 2024 rescinded and substituted with new Findings and Order requiring applicant to appear in person for deposition in California with costs paid by defendant; all other issues deferred
The Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the lack of jurisdiction to review the UR and IMR decisions and rejecting applicant's contentions of bad faith or improper UR.