The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
19
Page
1 of 1
Released decisions19 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ12006252 →Feb 9, 2026 · Los AngelesPanel decision
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as untimely and therefore the Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction to consider it; alternatively, if considered on merits, Petition would be denied.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Petition for Removal granted; Petition for Disqualification denied; March 14, 2023 minutes and March 27, 2023 Order Compelling attendance at QME rescinded; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings
Petition for Removal granted; WCJ's May 19, 2023 Order Vacating Submission amended to keep AME Dr. Sanders' reports in evidence; case submission vacated for further record development.
Petition for Reconsideration or Removal dismissed as untimely and for lack of jurisdiction; removal denied for failure to show substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.
The Petition for Disqualification was dismissed as untimely and, if not dismissed, would be denied on the merits. The applicant was admonished for using offensive language in the petition.