The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The Board rescinded the July 5, 2022 Findings and Order, substituted new findings and orders, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Findings and Order affirmed except amended to disallow sanctions and attorney's fees against defendant SCIF for the conduct at issue; defendant did not engage in bad faith actions or tactics.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; WCJ's May 9, 2025 Findings and Order rescinded; new order that Dr. Tarin's April 19, 2024 pathology report be sent to QME Dr. Bressler.
The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the March 21, 2025 Findings and Order, found the December 11, 2024 Utilization Review determination untimely, vested the WCAB with jurisdiction over the medical treatment dispute, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
Findings and Order issued on February 2, 2021, rescinded and substituted with new Findings and Order finding lien claimant met burden to show contested claim existed at time services were provided.
The WCAB denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Order issued on October 11, 2021, except amending it to defer the issue of whether medical treatment after October 11, 2005 was reasonable and necessary. The matter was returned to the WCJ for further proceedings.
Findings and Order of October 11, 2021 affirmed except issue of reasonableness and necessity of treatment after October 11, 2005 deferred; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings
The Petition for Reconsideration was granted, the October 13, 2023 Findings of Fact and Award were rescinded, and the matter was returned to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's Findings of Fact except it amended Finding of Fact 4 to remove the reference to employment. The WCAB found that lien claimant did not meet its burden to prove the injury was AOE/COE and that the treatment was reasonable and necessary. The issue of sanctions was deferred and moot.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Order, allowing applicant to treat with Dr. Curtis Spencer as her primary treating physician (PTP) outside of defendant's MPN, subject to defendant's future compliance with transfer of care provisions.
The WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's April 8, 2021 decision that defendant may not unilaterally cease inpatient care services at Casa Colina until a change in circumstances warrants a new utilization review determination.
The WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Order denying the medical necessity of the requested Temperpedic adjustable king size bed and denied the Applicant's Petition for Reconsideration.
February 27, 2014 en banc decision rescinded; Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant denied; September 20, 2013 Findings and Order of WCJ affirmed
The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration and ordered further proceedings and decision on whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required, pending issuance of a Decision After Reconsideration.
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's Findings, Award and Order Re: Lien of E&M Interpreting for services on June 20, 2006, and February 9, 2007, but deferred decision on the remainder of the lien for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
The Appeals Board rescinded the May 6, 2004 WCJ decision and remanded the matter to the WCJ to allow the defendant a reasonable time to initiate the AME/QME procedure and for the WCJ to redetermine the applicant's entitlement to right shoulder surgery after completion of the AME/QME procedure.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's determination awarding the testosterone cream treatment as reasonably required to relieve the applicant from the effects of his industrial injury.