The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The April 20, 2023 Findings of Fact is AFFIRMED; WCAB lacks jurisdiction due to an express agreement fixing payment amounts for medical treatment between lien claimant and defendant.
Findings and Orders dated July 18, 2019 rescinded; new findings substituted that WCAB lacks jurisdiction due to express agreement under Labor Code section 5304
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision that Barkal was not required to obtain fictitious-name permits from the Medical Board of California for his ownership interest in Beach Cities Surgery Center and Pain Intervention Therapy of San Diego, and that the ownership by Barkal and two chiropractors did not violate state law.
The WCAB granted the Petition for Removal, rescinded the June 12, 2023 Findings and Order, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Petition for reconsideration granted in part; WCJ decision affirmed except amended to find no collateral estoppel and no authority to order disgorgement of funds by guardian ad litem.
Applicant's objection to the Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Disqualification is denied. Applicant's January 5, 2022 Petition to Disqualify Judge Diana Marsteiner is denied.
The Joint Finding of Fact issued by the WCJ on July 7, 2021, finding AMPCO as the employer of the injured workers, was affirmed by the WCAB panel after reconsideration.