What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration granted; original Findings of Fact, Order rescinded and substituted with new Findings of Fact, Order finding applicant did not receive the supplemental job displacement voucher mailed on or around December 24, 2019; all other issues deferred.
Petition for Reconsideration granted by the WCAB panel, rescinding the January 7, 2026 Findings of Fact, Order and substituting a new Findings of Fact, Order.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant's credible testimony that he did not receive the voucher rebutted the presumption of receipt, leading to a finding that applicant did not receive the voucher mailed to the official address record.
From the decision · page 5Here, the WCJ issued a finding that defendant mailed the SJDV to applicant's address on the Official Address Record, which appears correct. However, the unrebutted testimony of applicant is that he was not living at that address at the time of service and that he did not receive the voucher. The WCJ found applicant's testimony credible. (See Garza, supra.) Thus, the evidentiary presumption is rebutted, and we will find that applicant did not receive the SJDV that defendant mailed in 2019.