What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration is DENIEDp. 2
Defendant filed a timely, verified Petition for Reconsideration of the February 8, 2021 Findings of Fact and Award. We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in the WCJ’s report, which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny reconsideration.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
applicant was not of the appropriate training or background to identify the industrial cause of his cumulative trauma claim, that the nature of the injury was not conducive to lay attribution, and as such, the appropriate date of injury is March 23, 2013
From the decision · page 3the date of injury per Lab. Code, § 5412 to be March 23, 2013
The period of liability per Lab. Code, § 5500.05 is the earlier of the last date of injurious exposure and the date of injury. The applicant's last day of professional baseball was June 8, 2012.