What the panel ordered
Petition for Disqualification DENIEDp. 4
Applicant seeks disqualification of the WCJ based upon the allegation that the WCJ committed judicial error in this case, which creates bias. We have not received an answer from defendant. The WCJ filed a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Disqualification (Report) recommending that we deny disqualification.
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold June 3, 2025.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant's allegations failed to set forth specific facts constituting a ground for disqualification under Code of Civil Procedure section 641 and were untimely or conclusory.
From the decision · page 1Applicant seeks disqualification of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) based upon the allegation that the WCJ committed judicial error in this case, which creates bias.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.