What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as withdrawn
Petition for Reconsideration filed and then withdrawn by petitioner
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Petitioner withdrew the petition for reconsideration, so the petition was dismissed.
From the decision · page 1The Petition for Reconsideration of the decision issued on October 14, 2024 has been withdrawn by petitioner. Therefore, it will be dismissed.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Petitioner withdrew the petition for reconsideration.
Favours Defendant prevailed
This withdrawal led to dismissal of the petition.
From the decision · page 1The Petition for Reconsideration of the decision issued on October 14, 2024 has been withdrawn by petitioner. Therefore, it will be dismissed.
The rules the panel named
Authorities as the decision cited them, with how this panel applied each one.
Labor Code section 5909
Labor Code section 5909
The Appeals Board must act on a petition for reconsideration within 60 days of transmission of the case to the Appeals Board.
From the decision · page 1Former Labor Code section 5909 provided that a petition for reconsideration was deemed denied unless the Appeals Board acted on the petition within 60 days from the date of filing. (Lab. Code, § 5909.) Effective July 2, 2024, Labor Code section 5909 was amended to state in relevant part that: (a) A petition for reconsideration is deemed to have been denied by the appeals board unless it is acted upon within 60 days from the date a trial judge transmits a case to the appeals board.
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.