What the panel ordered
Petitions for Reconsideration are dismissed as untimely and successive.
Applicant filed multiple successive and untimely petitions for reconsideration following a prior dismissal of her earlier petition as untimely.
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold May 17, 2021.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant's petitions were untimely and successive, and the Board lacks jurisdiction to consider untimely petitions or successive petitions absent new grounds.
From the decision · page 3In this case, the WCJ issued the decision on January 29, 2021. Based on the authority cited above, applicant had until Monday, March 1, 2021 to seek reconsideration in a timely manner. Therefore, to the extent the current Petitions for Reconsideration filed on May 25, 2021 and on June 2, 2021 seek reconsideration of the WCJ's January 29, 2021 decision, they are untimely.