What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration granted; final decision deferred pending further review of merits
Petition for Reconsideration granted; final decision deferred pending further review of merits
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further study whether meeting the elements in Labor Code section 3600.5(d)(1)(A) and (B) alone is sufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction in California, deferring final decision pending further review.
From the decision · page 2The issue submitted for decision was: Does California have subject matter jurisdiction over applicant's claim of cumulative traumatic injury?
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant did not play regularly, temporarily or otherwise within California during the claimed cumulative traumatic injury period.