What the panel ordered
The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if the matter proceeds to a final adverse decision.
Defendant filed a timely petition for removal from the Minutes of Hearing and Summary of Evidence (MOH/SOE) issued by the WCJ on March 25, 2026, challenging the disallowance of multiple exhibits.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board found that the petitioner did not demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if the matter proceeds to a final adverse decision.
From the decision · page 1Defendant has timely filed a petition for removal from the Minutes of Hearing and Summary of Evidence (MOH/SOE) issued on March 25, 2026, by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ).1 Within the MOH/SOE, the WCJ disallowed admission of multiple exhibits.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.