What the panel ordered
Petition for reconsideration of the Findings and Order issued April 16, 2024 is denied.
Applicant sought removal of the WCJ's Findings and Order invalidating QME panel 7629463 for failure to comply with AD Rule 30(b)(1)(C); the Board treated the petition as one for reconsideration and denied it.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant's proof of service did not show service of all required documents under AD Rule 30(b)(1)(C); thus, the QME panel was invalid.
From the decision · page 5Accordingly, we conclude that the record supports the finding that applicant failed to comply with AD Rule 30(b)(1)(C).
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant's proof of service did not show service of the online panel request and supporting documentation as required by AD Rule 30(b)(1)(C).
Favours Defendant prevailed