What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied.
Petition for Reconsideration filed and denied by the Appeals Board after review of the WCJ report and record.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition for reconsideration was denied because the petitioner failed to show significant prejudice or irreparable harm and reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy.
From the decision · page 4ultimately issues. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10955(a).) Here, based upon the WCJ's analysis of the merits of the petitioner's arguments, we are not persuaded that significant prejudice or irreparable harm will result if the petition is denied and/or that reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The petitioner challenged interlocutory findings that the parties are not required to return to Dr. Ovadia for remaining issues.