What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied
Petition for Reconsideration filed by Defendant challenging Findings and Award dated June 7, 2022
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Dr. Abrams' medical report was deemed substantial evidence supporting the injury to the neck, right arm, and right hand, and entitlement to temporary disability benefits. Defendant failed to provide rebuttal medical evidence and did not diligently investigate the claim, thus the Petition for Reconsideration was denied.
From the decision · page 4Dr. Abrams' report is substantial medical evidence.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Dr. Abrams' medical report was the sole medical evidence and was deemed substantial evidence supporting the injury and temporary disability.