What the panel ordered
Petition for Removal is DENIEDp. 3
We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Removal and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record and based upon the WCJ’s analysis of the merits of petitioner’s arguments in the WCJ’s report, we will deny removal.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
based upon the WCJ’s analysis of the merits of petitioner’s arguments in the WCJ’s report, we will deny removal and are not persuaded that substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will result if removal is denied
From the decision · page 1We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Removal and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record and based upon the WCJ’s analysis of the merits of petitioner’s arguments in the WCJ’s report, we will deny removal.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
based upon the WCJ’s analysis of the merits of petitioner’s arguments in the WCJ’s report, we are not persuaded that substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will result if removal is denied and/or that reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy if the matter ultimately proceeds to a final decision adverse to petitioner