What the panel ordered
Petition for reconsideration dismissed as untimely filed, Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction to consider the arguments.
Lien claimant United Med Radiology Network seeks reconsideration of the Order Dismissing Lien/Balances issued on December 30, 2025, by the WCJ, which dismissed the lien for failure to appear at lien conference on October 7, 2025.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Petition for reconsideration was dismissed because it was not timely filed within the jurisdictional time limits, depriving the Appeals Board of jurisdiction to consider the arguments.
From the decision · page 5had run. Lien claimant alleges no basis in the petition for reconsideration how its petition is timely. According to the Order, lien claimant was served with the Order generated from the December 30, 2025 hearing. As lien claimant's Petition for Reconsideration is untimely, the Appeals Board is without jurisdiction to act.2
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.