What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied
Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant after trial decision denying injury claim
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant did not meet burden of proving injury arising out of and in the course of employment to her eyes by a preponderance of the evidence.
From the decision · page 5It was found that the applicant had not met her burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of her employment.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant did not prove by preponderance of evidence that she sustained an industrial eye injury on 5/1/2019
Favours Defendant prevailed