What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied.
Petition for Reconsideration filed by Applicant's Attorney Ratto Law Firm, timely and verified, challenging the WCJ's Findings of Fact and attorney fee award division.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The WCJ considered the totality of itemizations, descriptions of services, and stipulated periods of representation, finding the division of attorney fees supported by evidence and legal standards.
From the decision · page 8After review of the evidence, the Court finds Ratto Law is liable to lien claimant for 60% percent of the attorney fees awarded and received, under the Stipulated Award.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Lien Claimant's itemization showed detailed labor expended securing TTD benefits and MPN list during initial discovery period.
Favours Defendant prevailed