What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration granted solely to correct typographical error in Findings of Fact number 6; June 20, 2025 Findings and Award otherwise affirmedp. 7
Applicant seeks reconsideration of WCJ’s June 20, 2025 Findings and Award; WCJ recommended denial; Appeals Board grants for limited purpose of correcting typographical error and otherwise affirms
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Delays in payment of temporary disability indemnity and corresponding penalties and attorney’s fees do not constitute separate and distinct acts; single ongoing continuous act; defendant has paid maximum allowable under Lab. Code, § 5814
From the decision · page 6Rather, they consist of a single, ongoing, continuous act, which began when defendant, believing applicant was no longer entitled to benefits, made the decision to terminate them. Taking into consideration defendant’s prior penalty payments, we agree with the WCJ that defendant “has paid the maximum allowable under Lab.