What the panel ordered
Petition for reconsideration granted, WCJ's Findings & Order rescinded, matter returned to trial level for further proceedings.
Defendant sought reconsideration of the WCJ's Findings & Order of August 1, 2023, which found injury AOE/COE and that applicant was not estopped or barred from making the claim. The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the F&O, and returned the matter for further proceedings.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The record was insufficient to determine whether applicant sustained one or two periods of cumulative trauma; further development of the record is required.
From the decision · page 8In this case, pursuant to section 3208.1, AME Dr. Hatch determined that applicant sustained industrial industry, however her testimony is equivocal as to the date of injury and whether one or more periods of cumulative trauma exist. Therefore, while there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion that applicant's injury was AOE/COE, we cannot determine based on the record before whether applicant sustained one or two cumulative injuries.