What the panel ordered
Petition for removal dismissed as withdrawn
Petition for removal from the Joint Order Rescinding Order dated October 27, 2025, issued December 23, 2025, by the WCJ
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold October 20, 2025.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Petition was withdrawn by applicant before decision on merits, so dismissal was appropriate.
From the decision · page 1Applicant has filed a petition for removal from the "Joint Order Rescinding Order Dated October 27, 2025", issued on December 23, 2025, by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ).
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant filed a petition for removal from the Joint Order Rescinding Order dated October 27, 2025, issued December 23, 2025, by the WCJ.
Favours neutral
This was the basis for the petition for removal proceeding.
From the decision · page 1Applicant has filed a petition for removal from the "Joint Order Rescinding Order Dated October 27, 2025", issued on December 23, 2025, by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ).
Applicant filed a petition to withdraw the petition for removal on March 3, 2026, as the parties had entered into a settlement.
Favours Defendant prevailed
Withdrawal of the petition led to dismissal of the petition for removal.
From the decision · page 1Thereafter on March 3, 2026, applicant filed a petition to withdraw the petition for removal as the parties had entered into a settlement.
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.